Worked example
Simple numbers, no skipping.
The setup:
You allocate $100,000 to a vault on January 1. Over the year the strategy returns 10%, a $10,000 gain. No drawdowns.
The fees:
Platform fee, 1%. About $1,000 for the year, accrued daily. Covers custody and infrastructure. All of it goes to MakeBanc.
Insurance fee, 1%. About $1,000 for the year, accrued daily. A pass-through of the insurance cost; MakeBanc keeps none of it.
Performance fee, 30%. Charged on the gain above the high water mark, and crystallized monthly. After the two 1% fees, the net gain is about $8,000, so the performance fee is 30% of $8,000 = $2,400. This is the asset manager's fee.
What you end with:
| Amount | |
|---|---|
| You allocated | $100,000 |
| Strategy gain (10%) | +$10,000 |
| Platform fee (1%) | -$1,000 |
| Insurance fee (1%) | -$1,000 |
| Performance fee (30%) | -$2,400 |
| Ending balance | $105,600 |
Your net return is about 5.6%. The dashboard shows net-of-fee NAV the whole way through. Redemption returns the net balance to your wallet.
Who gets what:
The 1% platform fee goes to MakeBanc. The 1% insurance fee is passed straight through, at cost. The $2,400 performance fee is the asset manager's; when MakeBanc pays it out, it charges a payment processing fee on it, taken from the asset manager's share, never from you.
If the strategy loses money:
Say the strategy is down 5% over the year. The 1% platform fee and 1% insurance fee still accrue. There is no performance fee, because there is no gain above the high water mark. The strategy must climb back above its previous peak before any performance fee is charged again.
What this is not:
These numbers are illustrative. Real strategies don't deliver clean 10% returns with no drawdowns. The point is to show how the mechanics work, not to suggest expected returns.